On Wednesday, Judge Analisa Torres concluded the initial phase of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) high-profile case against Ripple, imposing a $125 million penalty on the digital assets firm. Ripple is also prohibited from future violations of securities law. The penalty fell short of the $2 billion sought by the SEC, leading to a significant surge in the price of XRP—the token linked to Ripple, which soared over 20%.
The SEC v. The Ripple case, which commenced in late 2020, has been seen as a critical indicator for broader regulatory actions against the crypto industry, which argues that the SEC is exceeding its legal authority. Ripple executives and many in the crypto community have framed the decision as a win for the industry, though the prospect of an SEC appeal and the ambiguous language of the ruling suggest that regulatory clarity remains elusive.
Joe Castelluccio, a partner at Mayer Brown and co-leader of the firm’s fintech and blockchain practice groups, commented, “The immediate decision by Judge Torres is very positive for Ripple. However, it should still give the industry and the market a bit of pause.”
Ripple’s Position and Legal Battles
Founded in 2012, Ripple has established a strong presence in the crypto sector with its global payments network and XRP token, which boasts a $35 billion market cap and a dedicated following. The company has faced numerous legal challenges, including the 2020 lawsuit from the SEC under then-chair Jay Clayton. The case became a flagship litigation for the SEC under Clayton’s successor, Gary Gensler, who pursued aggressive enforcement against the crypto sector. The SEC alleged Ripple had violated the law by raising over $1.3 billion through an unregistered digital asset securities offering.
In July 2023, Judge Torres ruled that Ripple’s direct sales of XRP to institutional investors violated securities laws, while secondary sales on exchanges did not. Ripple and many industry observers celebrated the ruling, despite the SEC’s immediate appeal.
Recent rulings by other federal judges, including two in Torres’s district court, have yielded varied conclusions on crypto-related legal questions, creating a complex legal landscape that may ultimately be addressed by appeals courts or the Supreme Court.
Penalty and Injunction
Judge Torres’s final penalty of $125 million is closer to Ripple’s proposed amount than the SEC’s demand. A former SEC attorney, now working in crypto law, noted, “It’s hard not to see it as a win for Ripple,” especially since the judge denied the SEC’s request for disgorgements, meaning Ripple will not have to repay profits from its alleged illegal activities.
Read more: Tether to Double Staff by Mid-2025 in Compliance, Finance Push
However, Torres also imposed an injunction requiring Ripple to avoid further securities law violations. The ruling reflects Ripple’s “willingness to push the boundaries” of the law post-lawsuit, indicating a likelihood of future transgressions.
The ruling leaves unresolved questions about when digital token sales constitute securities offerings. Castelluccio pointed out that, despite the ruling, there remains a need for clearer regulatory guidelines and that the decision will not drastically alter market behavior due to ongoing litigation by the SEC against other crypto firms like Coinbase and Binance.
Future Outlook
The appeals process, which could extend to 2025 or later for higher court rulings, may be further complicated by potential Supreme Court involvement. Meanwhile, with growing congressional interest in crypto regulation, new legislative measures could address these legal issues before the courts provide definitive answers.
Cre: Fortune
David Ma was born in 1980 in California, is a Vietnamese American, known as one of the entrepreneurs and investors in the field of cryptocurrency and stock market. In 2006, he graduated from Stanford University with honors and began his career in business.
Email: [email protected]
